As I'm going through the NMLS training for my MLO endorsement, I had to stop and laugh (darkly) at the curriculum's comment on the purpose and value of the Secondary Mortgage Market.
First, for any non-mortgage industry visitors, the Secondary Mortgage Market is where residential loans are packaged up in neat little packages and sold off to investors like stocks. That is a gross simplification, but it works.
I have read before that the purpose of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was to provide a secondary market for loans to be sold and keep money infused in the system; this would mitigate risk for lenders and make loans easier. THAT certainly happened. The laughable part of the curriculum is that it offered a level of quality control and consumer confidence.
Why is this funny?
Because Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae did not (sadly) have sufficient quality controls in place to make sure that loans bought and sold on were for the best interest of the consumer (and quite apparently, the country and world at large). I'm not putting entire blame on them, the economic problems of today are the result of greed, short-sightedness and corruption all around. From the little consumer, to their mortgage broker, the big lender and all the way up to the highest levels of government.
Point is: the incredible appreciation that was going on across the country was beyond the point of reason. I live in the San Francisco Bay Area. In the East Bay in 2004 a small 900 SF bungalows was selling for about $300k (in ok condition). That incredible price, for something so small, would have been in excess of a million dollars by 2010 at that rate of appreciation. A million dollars for a little bunglaow? Unless you're in top notch condition, located in the heart of an EXTREMELY valuable neighborhood, we all know that is just insane.
I was in the mortgage industry from 2003-2007 as a processor and underwriter. I was in no high level position, but I still feel like I should have realized something was amiss. Certainly, those in positions of authority should have been more than just aware of the peril, they should have been doing something about it.
But not enough was done and instead of instilling confidence and quality control the secondary market allowed lenders to continue to give money away on homes with little consequence for later default, until everything reached a saturation point and the market collapsed under its own bloated weight.
That's why it is funny. The part that isn't funny is that the money is still out there, but it isn't in the hands of the average person. Yep. All because the Secondary Mortgage Market instilled quality control and confidence.
Perhaps that is a bit snarky to state, but if the secondary market didn't exist, then lenders would have given out money slower and would have had to be more responsible if the loans they made defaulted. Whether they can sell the property and recoup their losses is pointless, because the process is long and can be expensive.
Now that changes have to be made, I have yet to see any that are actual solutions. Instead, there appear to be a series of hastily prepared bandages put in place to make the market "safe". Some may have a little effect, but most just look like needless extra layers of government.